Machinima Presentation Evaluation

Hi,

Here I am going to discuss how; the short Machinima presentation went, evaluate my performance and finally evaluate the group’s performance.

The entire group worked well together, we were quick to divide the work between each member and all group members produced sufficient research for the slides.
Peter and Mathew presented our presentation; I think it would have been more beneficial for the audience for Peter and Mathew to practice the presentation.
Although the presentation was “off-the-cuff” I think they did very well in conveying are research to the audience.

In retrospect I think are slides were a little inconsistent, they lacked cohesion. This was because each member produced the slides individually. Although we did vet each slide and made sure fonts, size and colour where the same we did not look at content. Two sides in particular had far too much written content for the audience to absorb.

One point raised in the group discussion was that some text was difficult to read because of the colour of the font. For my next presentation these will be a priority to get right.

Personally I think the grade we were given matched the effort we put in as a group.
I will be more accurate with my presentation in the future and make sure that all the little details are correct; this is the main reason why we did not achieve a higher grade.

Lewis Drinnan